(For those who still don’t get it and need more context)
(For those who still don’t get it and need more context).
Member article
This article is available to Synth members. Membership is $50 per year and unlocks member articles through your Samirac account.
Continue reading
I gave ChatGPT an external specification for how I write. It understood it, had followed it before, and then ignored it anyway. What happened next became an unexpectedly clean demonstration of AI drift, external correction, and why having a rule is not the same thing as enforcing it at execution.
Samirac AI and Gaia Nexus completed a live interoperability exercise inside dAIsy using Gaia Nexus Detection Events and a Samirac Execution Contract. The test demonstrated that external evidence can change execution requirements—from admissible, to additional validation, to second review—without changing the actor’s identity, authority or permissions.
And by creep, I mean drift or institutional drift.